<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: C is fer&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nixonmcinnes.co.uk/2008/12/22/c-is-fer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nixonmcinnes.co.uk/2008/12/22/c-is-fer/</link>
	<description>Social media and web design agency operating in London and Brighton</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:58:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Trevor May</title>
		<link>http://www.nixonmcinnes.co.uk/2008/12/22/c-is-fer/comment-page-1/#comment-1422</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 10:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nixonmcinnes.co.uk/?p=461#comment-1422</guid>
		<description>How the Dickens (Merry Christmas and a happy new year to you, sir) did you miss out &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Creative Commons&lt;/a&gt;? :)

Community... CMS... Commenting... Ooh, &lt;i&gt;Control&lt;/i&gt;... or its absence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How the Dickens (Merry Christmas and a happy new year to you, sir) did you miss out <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons" rel="nofollow">Creative Commons</a>? :)</p>
<p>Community&#8230; CMS&#8230; Commenting&#8230; Ooh, <i>Control</i>&#8230; or its absence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.nixonmcinnes.co.uk/2008/12/22/c-is-fer/comment-page-1/#comment-1420</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 23:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nixonmcinnes.co.uk/?p=461#comment-1420</guid>
		<description>Censorship vs. Freedom of Speech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Censorship vs. Freedom of Speech.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan mcquillan</title>
		<link>http://www.nixonmcinnes.co.uk/2008/12/22/c-is-fer/comment-page-1/#comment-1419</link>
		<dc:creator>dan mcquillan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 23:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nixonmcinnes.co.uk/?p=461#comment-1419</guid>
		<description>A great and meaty post (er, in a vegetarian sense). 

Coincidentally, I&#039;ve just re-read the Cluetrain and I&#039;m gobsmacked at it&#039;s prediction of much-that-is-socialweb (http://twitter.com/danmcquillan/statuses/1024360318).

As far as costs / lack of investment goes, &#039;fraid it&#039;ll take more cases of incumbents getting drubbed by one-click orgs before they start to seriously turn their supertankers.  

Btw, i wouldn&#039;t let mainstream media &amp; politics off the hook when it comes to childish behaviour; treat us like infants and lo, we are infantilised. 

Continuous Partial Attention as artificial crisis is a good point. I think the Dalai Lama has muttered something similar w.r.t. tech generally. 

The counterpoint is the stuff about cognition. I&#039;ll take your rec re: stowe boyd (don&#039;t know his stuff) but the idea that our minds &#039;store and retrieve bits of information&#039; or can be &#039;rewired&#039; is imho hogwash. Me love tech, because it cracks the status quo, but i don&#039;t want more mechanistic metaphors for mentation. 

Closing thought: are markets _really_ conversations? Or at heart are they about _committments_?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great and meaty post (er, in a vegetarian sense). </p>
<p>Coincidentally, I&#8217;ve just re-read the Cluetrain and I&#8217;m gobsmacked at it&#8217;s prediction of much-that-is-socialweb (<a href="http://twitter.com/danmcquillan/statuses/1024360318" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/danmcquillan/statuses/1024360318</a>).</p>
<p>As far as costs / lack of investment goes, &#8216;fraid it&#8217;ll take more cases of incumbents getting drubbed by one-click orgs before they start to seriously turn their supertankers.  </p>
<p>Btw, i wouldn&#8217;t let mainstream media &amp; politics off the hook when it comes to childish behaviour; treat us like infants and lo, we are infantilised. </p>
<p>Continuous Partial Attention as artificial crisis is a good point. I think the Dalai Lama has muttered something similar w.r.t. tech generally. </p>
<p>The counterpoint is the stuff about cognition. I&#8217;ll take your rec re: stowe boyd (don&#8217;t know his stuff) but the idea that our minds &#8217;store and retrieve bits of information&#8217; or can be &#8216;rewired&#8217; is imho hogwash. Me love tech, because it cracks the status quo, but i don&#8217;t want more mechanistic metaphors for mentation. </p>
<p>Closing thought: are markets _really_ conversations? Or at heart are they about _committments_?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FutureGov &#187; Useful links &#187; links for 2008-12-29</title>
		<link>http://www.nixonmcinnes.co.uk/2008/12/22/c-is-fer/comment-page-1/#comment-1418</link>
		<dc:creator>FutureGov &#187; Useful links &#187; links for 2008-12-29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 13:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nixonmcinnes.co.uk/?p=461#comment-1418</guid>
		<description>[...] C is fer… @ NixonMcInnes: Social media goodness. Translated. Created. Delivered. The social media alphabet moves onto C this week (tags: social media howto agency nixonmcinnes) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] C is fer… @ NixonMcInnes: Social media goodness. Translated. Created. Delivered. The social media alphabet moves onto C this week (tags: social media howto agency nixonmcinnes) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
